Well, the difficulty, Chair, comes from the fact that if moneys are carried over to the subsequent year and are spent in that subsequent year, you will have $1 billion more in expenditures than was initially forecast. Given the size--$1 billion is really significant on the bottom line of the public accounts--I can understand the hesitation of the Department of Finance to allow a department to have a possibility of carrying forward up to $1 billion, because that could really swing their fiscal forecasting going forward. To me, that would be the most significant impact there could be.
On September 28th, 2009. See this statement in context.