Those were interesting comments in the report, which we certainly agreed with. They're factual, but there was some missing information. From 1993 to 2001, this authority was successful, fortunately, and generated surpluses over $8 million. Because of those surpluses, we froze our tariffs. Once the traffic started to go down in 2002 or 2003, the authority had an agreement with its main users to use up this surplus, therefore incurring operating losses. In one of the two years where the traffic projections were way off, this authority ended up losing $2 million and $3 million without being able to address that. It was a scheduled loss, and we did quite well at it. How we would plan on working out the future is just that: controlling our costs, watching traffic, and amending our tariff accordingly.
