To the peer review team, there's hardly an institution in a developed country that isn't in some sort of transition somewhere: everything seems to be in motion, with institutions modernizing and updating, etc. So as you look at the Office of the Auditor General here, as was just described, there may be some things in transition, so wouldn't it be a waste of time to be looking at things in transition that you cannot actually get a snapshot of because they're in motion?
Wouldn't it be more efficient simply not to review it and to say that you're not doing this or that component because it's in transition and you can't get a good measurement of it, and so it would get a nil report? Don't you have circumstances like that? Isn't it a waste of time to look at a component of an operation if it is in transition?