I'm not trying to justify it; I'm just saying that for some reason this has gone under four different governments since 1991 and about seven different Parliaments, and I'm trying to understand why it wasn't changed before.
For the people from Finance, are there any other risk-benefit advantages to holding $4 billion of these companies' money? For example, if one of them goes bankrupt, are you at the front of the line anyway? Do you have an advantage holding their money if they go under?