Do we think that the agreement that was entered with CEEA-T was isolated? Some suggestions were brought up: that it could have been due to the overly aggressive lobbyists; that perhaps the program director had been errant in his decision; that there were some mitigating factors; as well as that we didn't have a solid framework in place to assess risk and have a strong conflict of interest guideline in place.
What would you say? Were there other factors?