Thank you for your question.
It's fairly complex, because there are a number of reports, all focused on the same situation.
The reference I made to money not being lost or overpayments not made reflects the fact that in April 2006 the payments under CEEA-T were suspended to allow for a much more rigorous review of all of the deliverables under the specific contribution agreement. As I mentioned, there was a very detailed review; it took a dedicated team to go through these 760 program deliverables to ensure that section 34 of the Financial Administration Act had been fully complied with. It was after that rigorous review that there was a sort of truing up in terms of what the crown was responsible or obligated to pay for work that at that time had been completed.