I'd certainly be pleased to elaborate on the role of the RCMP.
Natural Resources Canada invited the RCMP to review the facts on two occasions, in May 2006 and then upon conclusion of the internal audit in July 2006. All of the findings of the internal audit were provided to the RCMP. After its review, the RCMP noted that there was no evidence of wrongdoing warranting either further review or initiation of a criminal investigation.
So there were two formal referrals to the RCMP, and the formal response was provided in July 2006, after the full audit material was provided.