Thank you. I'm sorry to interrupt.
These are important omissions. To me, there's a whole set of criticisms that your department is open to because you didn't do the job properly after 2006. Had the Auditor General not gotten an anonymous complaint and gone in there, you would still have procedures lacking: paragraph 6.27 says your evaluation documents are still “silent on conflict of information issues”, that they are “not supplemented by guidance for staff”, and that “we found that the new practices and processes still do not require an assessment”. This was after your great internal audit of 2006.
What happened? Some things happen in this world. Fine; you go in and look at it and fix it. But your fix didn't fix it. So what happened there? After you were already in there trying to fix it, you didn't fix it right.