I think one of the big issues, as was mentioned earlier, was the quality of the data. An evaluation was going to be done, but then it was realized that the data was inaccurate, to put it mildly. We looked at the data from 2006, and you will see in the report that a number of contracts were identified as containing intellectual property when they clearly had no intellectual property in them. So there was no point in proceeding with an evaluation if that was the quality of the underlying data. Work has been done since then to try to improve the quality and then do the evaluation of the policy.
