If I may, Mr. Christopherson, I was going to make a statement too. I'll just read the last part of the motion:
That the Committee ask the Auditor General to conduct an audit of the Integrated Relocation Program (IRP) as of April 1999, including the tendering and awarding of the 2009 contract, and to present her findings to Parliament.
As I pointed out when this motion came before the committee, we do not have control over the Auditor General's workload or her agenda. All we can do is make a motion. She and her office have their own methodologies on risk and what she will and won't audit. That was a recommendation and nothing more. We weren't going to extend or disallow contracts; it would be a performance audit on the actual awarding of that contract. That's certainly my interpretation of the motion.
Again, it's entirely up to her office as to the next step. She did indicate that she would get back to us.
Am I correct, Madam Auditor General?