I'm sorry, but wouldn't that have been discovered in the 2003 audit? That doesn't sound to me like anything new. It sounds to me like something you would have thought of as a response to the first go-round, and now we're on the second go-round. My sense is, if we sit here and nothing changes, in another five years another committee is going to get another report and they're going to see the numbers still going up. So I'm asking what you're doing to change what you've been doing, since what you've been doing isn't working.
On February 24th, 2009. See this statement in context.