Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
First, you say that the Agency deported approximately 12,600 people from Canada, including 1,900 criminals, in 2006-2007. In another connection, it says here that some 22,000 individuals are being monitored, while 41,000 are not. Could some of those 41,000 be high-risk individuals?
Does that mean that the Agency is lacking major resources to monitor these people? This is a net that is being opened; we're leaving the door wide open. Other countries can criticize Canada for all kinds of things; they say it's a kind of sieve. If we're the cause of that, I believe that's important.
I also want to go back to paragraph 7.29, concerning holding cells. The Toronto facility is overcrowded. There are 10 individuals in a cell that can hold three. I find that a bit dramatic, even if these are refugees or individuals who are not necessarily high risk. Our detention centres have non-standard criteria. Why?
Once again, are we lacking resources in terms of infrastructure? We talk about Kingston, which is about to shut down because there's virtually no one there. What is the Agency going to do with that building, whereas institutions are glaringly overcrowded elsewhere?
Institutions should meet the standards of the Canadian Red Cross. Have you checked to see whether we're at least meeting that kind of standard? We're talking about the availability of beds, accessibility and provincial holding centres. What's being done with the 41,000 individuals who are walking around? Perhaps they've left the country; we don't know where they are.