One of the issues was coverage. Another was the nature. Another was the ability to tailor the type of evaluation to the type of program. Another was clarity around the collection of data, or performance measurement. We also addressed the issue of governance, the independence, if I could put it that way, of the evaluation function as well as the responsibilities of the deputy head in relation to the evaluation function.
We covered a range of issues. A lot of those are very similar to the issues raised by the audit. At the same time, they also address a number of issues we have found as part of the capacity to assess programs in light of expenditures.
The second component, the really important one, was the series of interviews that were held with deputy heads around the usefulness and importance—and this came directly from colleagues—of the use of evaluation as a management tool for the effectiveness of programs and the results. All those elements are now in the policy, the directive, and the standard.