Could I now move on to another very important issue that is addressed in the report—labelling. The report says: “While labelling of chemical products in the workplace is required to indicate the hazards of chronic use, no similar requirement exists for certain consumer products where multiple or long-term use may pose chronic hazards.” One may wonder why there would be less stringent requirements to protect consumers than there are to protect workers. Those products even include some children's toys.
Could I ask the Commissioner why no recommendation was made on the important issue of labelling?