Actually, in a lot of respects, I think we're further ahead than others in trying to calibrate the movement towards meeting the target. We tried to find some way of characterizing it rather than saying it's 70% or 60%, which would fall into the same trap of giving lower value measures the same importance as higher value measures.
We've tried to give it a bit of a qualitative spin with “mostly met”. That doesn't mean you're fully there. It means you're most of the way there. If you're not there at all, then we want to be able to characterize that as well. It's a bit of a qualitative assessment.