Okay. Well, obviously, we'll have our analysts take those words and take the documents and conclude.... But if you're going to tell me the negative stuff is all buried in the next step, that's not that great.
I don't have a lot of time. Again, the template thing still makes me crazy. When I went to Transport, I wanted to see risks. I went to the table of contents and there was “risks”; I could find it. Here it's not even in the table of contents. I had to find it on my own.
So again, there's this business of a lack of commonality. Risk is important these days. I wanted to ask questions about cyber-risk. I'm not even going to get to that today, but part of it was that I should be able to pick up this document and look for “risk”. To their credit, they did it in Transport. They didn't do it in Industry.
While I'm on risk, if I may, it seems to me.... I look at this thing and I don't see a balance on risk. It says in the handbook that you're to show the negatives and the positives of things. The risk looks to me like just an essay study; I mean, it really.... Where's your analysis of your security risks, your cyber-risks, and the other risks? Where are those in there?