Okay. Maybe I should allow the department to give more explanations about the series of questions I asked.
Before that, I have a short comment. I understand that you want to improve year by year. What we tried to do today was give you ways to do it. It's not only to improve here and there; it's to change your approach. I think Mr. Christopherson mentioned that it's important that you have a buildup over the years.
For example, if we want to know if our transportation is safer in Canada, we should be able to do it in this report, and not by data that change from year to year, but through a table, where each year you add the new data you have. If you don't have any data, you cannot invent it. But you can say that this is the data you have available and it shows that, yes, our transportation is safer, and these are the programs, the measures, and the strategies you are undertaking to be sure that's the case.
On the CO2 emissions from the auto industry, it's the same point. You should have a trajectory that shows where we are going and, year after year, we would have a report that is workable for you. So not only is it readable, but it's workable.
So where are we on this trajectory on CO2 emissions for the auto industry?