Thank you for that.
The response to that question comes down to how we look at our risk and how we use the integrated risk management methodology. As I pointed out in my opening remarks, we have spent a great deal of money over the last many years enhancing or replacing those systems that we felt were at highest risk.
The systems that we feel we have to replace most urgently are the radio systems, and we have a strategy in place for that. Where the aging IT systems actually did hit the top five--the risks were assessed, and we included the top five on the RCMP risk register--“aging IT systems” as a title didn't make the top five. What did make the list was “lack of funding”. That's where we can tie in our need to get funding to replace the systems, as we prioritize them.