No, I understand, but I'm sorry, I still didn't hear a clear answer to my question. And I accept it could be just me, that maybe I didn't get it.
Again, you only give money once they've achieved certain things. I'm just curious as to how they could continue to get funding when they haven't done something like a strategic plan, which is so important and needs to be up front in the process. There are some jurisdictions that haven't.
I'm probably not using the right terminology, but there's a checklist of things they have to do. Is a strategic plan not one of them?