In terms of taxpayers' dollars, the fact that the Senate and the House don't want to share a temporary chamber is not going to be that wasteful--is that a good way to put it?
I would have thought that if you have to move the House and Senate out and you build a temporary chamber for them, they could have in sequence shared the same chamber. When you're doing the House of Commons, the MPs move out and then they move back into their chamber. Then the senators would move into that same temporary chamber while the Senate chamber is being renovated. That's not what's going to happen, I gather. Are you saying that's not wasteful?