Thank you, Mr. Chair.
To your three questions, I have three answers.
The report will be made available to you. I made that commitment before.
The second point I would make about the report, having gone through it, is that it's a mixture of what Madam Fraser has done, what I would call an analysis of what the issues are. So it was not a straight “this is what the model should be”. It goes through an analysis of the issues that we and the parliamentarians are facing from a governance perspective. That's one point.
My next point is that goes through a number of principles. Frankly, some of them I have used, principles that should be considered in looking at governance models.
Thirdly, it does propose governance options.
There is also the custodianship model.
There are various structures that involve BOIE and COIE, etc. The only point I would make on this, and it's more an observation than a criticism, is that the analysis portion of the report--i.e., the actual models--is somewhat brief. This is where it needs further analysis, to me as a person who likes to dig and understand the ramifications of certain things. But the substance of this report will not be excluded from the analysis that we will do over summer—far from that.
That's what the report is about. It was not singularly about the models, but really was a dissertation on the issues and principles, and it offered a couple of models.