Thank you.
We've clearly stated that the governance issue is problematic. We've seen examples of and pointed to delays in the project because people can't agree on priorities. It would be nice to have a single authority, but there will always be other people who have either influence or control over this.
When we talk about heritage buildings, there will always be the heritage assessors, or whatever, who will do that. There's the funding, which has to come from government, so Treasury Board will always have a role. But creating a body--however that will be structured, and the custodianship goes back to Parliament--will eliminate some of the difficulties in the current model.
So it would help to have this body, however it is structured, that would be more accountable for the decisions that are made, and would negotiate directly with Treasury Board for the funding. That would eliminate some of the disagreements that have occurred over the years.