Auditor General, I think you were using the concept of lowest-cost compliant, which is the policy that says we know what we need, we'll take it off the shelf. What you described was a situation where, if I might use the example, you have a Chevy and then you want to soup it up. If you know, when you're putting in that policy, that you want the end result, then you should have the end result in your first assessment. That's not, in your estimation, an appropriate process to be labelled under the umbrella of a lower-cost compliant? Is that what I should understand?
On October 28th, 2010. See this statement in context.