Mr. Chairman, on the first amendment....
Regarding the first amendment, there was a difference of opinion with regard to certain aspects of the contract. What we use in the terminology is called "excusable delays". In our opinion, there was a reason for the delays which were requested by the company, and these reasons were acceptable. That is the first reason.
The second one is that we did not agree with the company on a certain number of elements. I'm still referring to the first amendment. It totalled about $100 million and we put the matter to arbitration. In the contract, there is a provision which calls for arbitration when there is a difference of opinion regarding the interpretation of certain elements in the contract.
Therefore, after more dialogue and consultation with our colleagues at defence, we made an additional and separate investment for additional motor and transmission capacity, which was reported on in detail by the Auditor General.