I have a question for Ms. Fraser, following up on the response, regarding this issue of choice and whether aircraft other than the Chinook were looked at. Was that something you looked at in your audit? You did go back to 2005. Did you look at that process of examining other aircraft?
I'm bending over backwards to understand the position of the department as much as I can. Is it acceptable, from a government management point of view, to decide that this is the platform that is going to meet our needs, but it really does require modifications to do exactly what we want? Is there anything particularly wrong with that?
I do know it took from 2005 to 2009 for them to decide exactly what they wanted. Is it unreasonable to say, looking at all these, that this one looks about the best, but to make it exactly the best for us we need all these things to happen? Is there anything fundamentally wrong with that?