Just on that point--because you raised a good point--you said that it's simply a guide, and then we heard from Public Works before that there was a difference of interpretation.
I'd like to ask the Auditor General to shed some light on this. Is this simply, in your opinion, a guide and a difference in interpretation, or was it that it genuinely, as you stated, “did not fully comply with the oversight and approval framework set out in its Project Approval Guide”, nor did it “develop full life-cycle plans and costs for these helicopters in a complete and timely way”, and is that why you referred to the fact that this process, in your opinion, “was not fair, open and transparent”?