I just have one quick point.
In most cases we're here to ask questions and to get responses. But on this particular one, I can recall the first line of questioning: the first questioner spoke for probably six to seven minutes right off the bat, without even asking the question, and then, at the end of the entire seven minutes, asked a question.
At some particular point, we're either here to listen to them or ask a question and get a response. But to sit there and run off with a verbal diatribe of thoughts or processes rather than getting to the witnesses, obviously.... You know, we weren't very effective or efficient as a committee on that particular day. Maybe that's just a little lesson down the road.
I'm against bringing them all back again. I just think that's a terrible waste of time, effort, resources.
And I thank Madame Faille for recognizing that we should have a context to our meeting and at least a purpose and a sense of direction so that we can all prepare.