That's one thing. I don't want to start another debate. I am going to be very careful about what I say.
I talked about inviting all the witnesses back for the reasons I explained. When we asked questions of one witness on Tuesday, often the witness would respond by saying he could only partly answer the question, and that the rest of the answer had to be provided by another department which was not represented at the table.
So, that's why I am suggesting that everyone be called back. If we were talking about targeting witnesses, I would not have a problem with that. But that is not what the motion says at this time.
The idea is to recall all the witnesses for the reasons I've already given. On a regular basis, witnesses were telling us to put those questions to someone else in another department—for example, to ask the Treasury Board Secretariat. Another time, instead of the Treasury Board Secretariat, it was National Defence that had to answer the question, and on and on.
So, if we invite them to appear individually…