At this stage, it looks as though there may be at least three outcomes that we need from this. One, of course, is a new commissioner. We need to fix and strengthen the department itself, and then we also need to await your recommendations on further checks and balances procedures.
Are those the three outcomes that you would see: getting a new commissioner, getting the department running the way it should, making sure it's staffed properly, trying to rebuild some esprit de corps, and then, lastly, making sure we have mechanisms in place to avoid having this happen again with another officer of Parliament?