Monsieur D'Amours has presented a motion. The reason I said that I thought the first part was very much like the summons.... The summons was pretty straightforward. It was very factual, and it followed a particular formula, a legal formula, that had been provided to the committee for us to consider and approve.
Mr. D'Amours has followed that up with the motion that you see before you, in English and in French, respecting a breach of privileges. This doesn't preclude anything else, but it is a specific item that we have before us and that we would debate at this juncture.
I have a list, but I'm not sure that list pertains to this motion, so I'm entertaining a speakers list on this motion.
Mr. Kramp and Mr. Christopherson.