Mr. Christopherson, that was my understanding as well. But I wanted to clarify it with Madame Faille, because she's the one who made the intervention.
I think Madame Faille gave the committee an indication that what she wanted was that there be a motion, whether it would be in steering committee or whether it would be here, that the committee make PCO, PMO, Treasury Board, all of the people associated with the decision with respect to this office and the commissioner...and that the documentation also be provided. Whether the appropriate place to do that is now with your amendment and Mr. D'Amours' motion, or whether it be done in steering committee and then presented to committee is, I guess, an issue more of convenience than anything else. But I didn't hear anybody say no.
So on your behalf, I'm going to take it that there is consensus that Madame Faille's motion will be dealt with thoroughly in steering committee. And unless she says no, then I'm going to proceed with consideration of your amendment.