Mr. Chairman, I agree entirely. We have to have the document before us in both official languages. I made a small sarcastic comment before, but that is reality. This has always been the case. We want both documents in both official languages before accepting them. If I understood correctly Mr. Chairman, a document was tabled earlier and I think it was in one language only. On that, if that is the case, we had said previously that Mr. Kramp could table a stand-alone motion. We could work on the main motion, Ms. Faille's motion with the amendment or amendments I have presented. During that time, Mr. Kramp will have the opportunity to have his motion translated and to submit it on Tuesday. Then we will be able to study it, analyze it and vote on it.
On February 10th, 2011. See this statement in context.