Mr. Chair, I don't understand why we have to include that in the main motion, as amended, submitted by Ms. Faille, when it does not concern witnesses. The motion is asking that we be given specific information. It has nothing to do with knowing whether the information to be provided by witnesses who will appear before the committee is personal or not. The purpose of the motion is to obtain information.
Moreover, my amendment was asking that two points be added, that is that we receive a copy of the letter of resignation and of any agreement that may have transpired between Ms. Ouimet and the Government of Canada. I think that the wool is being pulled over our eyes so that we not obtain some of the information we are trying to obtain. We don't want to hear witnesses, we want to receive information on a specific matter. We want documents. I don't know why they are trying to make us believe that someone will have to explain to us whether or not we have the right to receive certain documents. I am asking that these documents be given to us. It's not complicated. I don't understand why someone should have to tell us whether or not we have the right to have documents or not. We need these documents in this committee.
We need those documents and that's what we request. It was in my amendment, and now I think we should go to the main motion of Madame Faille that includes my amendment.