Colleagues, I said we were going to limit debate, and I see us going back and forth all over the place.
Mr. Kramp, the intent has now been asked about a couple of times. It is one where we are talking about relying on a resource, on a specific legislation having to do with privacy. I think all members are conscious of that and they support it. If the intent was to get it on the record, it's on the record.
The intent, as Mr. Christopherson has asked--I think on behalf of everybody--is to have the Privacy Commissioner here. I'm not sure that would have needed an amendment. But to get that across, one of the very first things I can take from this committee today, right now, without having to vote on the amendment or a main motion is that it is the committee's intention that the clerk or the chair ask the Privacy Commissioner to appear before this committee next Tuesday, along with Mr. Walsh, to give us the appropriate guidance on any material we may receive.
Mr. Kramp, if that was your intention, then I think we can do that without having to vote on the amendment. But if it is your intention to vote on the amendment because this is what you want to do, then that's it.
I think we've clarified that. I said I wanted to end everything.
Monsieur D'Amours, you will have to be very brief, and then I'm going to call for the vote on the amendment.