Thank you, Mr. Kramp.
I'm going to remind colleagues about one thing before I proceed to the next step.
We had, as per our own motions, invited Mr. Walsh to give us advice regarding next steps, and that advice would be legal advice as we would go along the way.
On your behalf, I invited Madame Bernier in order to provide us with some insights with respect to the privacy issues that would flow from that...even though the committee said, no, we've done that. I thank her again for coming, and I thank Mr. Walsh for coming.
All of this is to say, Mr. Christopherson and Madame Faille, that perhaps we can accommodate both perceptions, but I think in terms of chronology, we might hear from Mr. Walsh first, and any of the decisions that we might have questions from with respect to Madame Bernier would take place afterwards.
So I would say that we would continue--because we're talking about next steps first, and then implications therefrom--and that we would suspend to go in camera first and afterwards go public for any other questions we might have for Madame Bernier.
I'm prepared to entertain a motion to that effect.
Mr. Bains is the one who made the suggestion that he wanted to go in camera.
If you make a motion, then we can have an indication right away--unless everybody is in agreement right now.
Mr. Bains.