Thank you very much. I'll be sharing my time with Mr. Wrzesnewskyj.
I just want to follow up on the question asked by some of my colleagues here today, which I think is a very important issue, and I'm actually genuinely frustrated now because I don't understand how we can proceed like this.
We are talking about third party oversight. There seems to be unanimous support for it. There have been three years of reports and task forces, as Mr. Christopherson has mentioned. We've examined this issue every which way possible, and you now mention that you need to do further due diligence.
It just boggles the mind. What other due diligence is required? Could you elaborate on what that due diligence is? What else remains? And what is the associated timeline with that due diligence? Because I think we need to now have a perspective on when we can see results, as opposed to going in circles, which seems to be the case.