Thank you, Mr. Chair. The whole matter of employment agencies bothers me a bit. I would like to know what you think.
In the public service, people have casual contracts. Unfortunately, they can remain casual employees for a long time. Furthermore, based on what we know about them, employment agencies make a lot of money through federal funds. In my humble opinion, it would be better to have faithful employees in the organization than to do extensive business with employment agencies. However, I'm not saying that people don't have a need for these agencies.
Do you notice that the government tends to spend more money by using employment agencies, by hiring casual employees, rather than people who would eventually become indeterminate employees?