Thank you, Chair. I appreciate that.
The Auditor General mentioned that there was a discrepancy between the reason that was submitted to Treasury Board for the purchase and the analysis that was done by the army. They were different. No one has yet explained why that was. Would someone quickly do so, please?
Why did you say that the reason was one thing to Treasury Board, I think, and when the Auditor General checked the analysis of the army itself in terms of what was used to form that recommendation, it was different. Help me understand the two.