That's certainly not something I've given a lot of thought to at this point; I would have to take it under advisement.
My understanding of the legislation—and I believe it's very similar to the legislation in New Brunswick—is that in situations in which the Auditor General does not receive all of the information the Auditor General has asked for, the Auditor General is to report that fact to Parliament. That ends up being much of the role of this type of committee and of Parliament.
The Auditor General would have to work within the requirements and the restrictions of the legislation, but if the Auditor General felt that those restrictions were affecting a particular audit, then the Auditor General would raise that type of issue with this committee.
I can't really speak to any specific situation. I don't know the fact base behind any specific situation, so I can't give you an opinion on any specific set of facts.