To pick up on the comment that the minister made, we agree with the Auditor General's recommendation about greater clarity. It is a technical process we have that when a subprogram is a subset of a program, in this instance the border infrastructure fund, we roll up all of the subprogram elements into the main program heading. It's a technical aggregation, and in that sense, it is appropriate for us to do that. We have done that for over a hundred years. It is simply an aggregation of a subprogram element into a main program. There is no element of error. It is essentially a technical process that we go through.
We recognize that in some instances that aggregation may be at a too-high level. Should we be more transparent and provide more information on the sub-elements of a program? We have agreed with the Auditor General's recommendations, and in fact have taken steps to ensure that in the future when those differences in program elements are substantial, the subprogram elements will be separated from the programs, and the elements in the funds attributed to those will be clearly set out.