I'm not saying, Mr. Byrne, that the explanation for lack of paperwork is because it was a perfect process; I'm saying that the reason why I insisted they go from 242 down to 33 was for time reasons--we had only a limited amount of time to actually build structures, or roads, or parks, or what have you--but at the same time, I felt at the time that they were asking for too much from government. I mean, $500 million cannot fit into a $50-million fund, so I said to them, make your priorities.
The point of the Auditor General is that, look, when you created that system, the documentation or the paperwork wasn't there for deciding how you got from 242 down to 33. I agree with her. With the benefit of 20/20 hindsight, if I could reverse time and go back to that point, I would recommend to the government that they would in fact create the paper process that's missing.