Mr. Ralston, I think you just nailed some of it. That is the trouble. As parliamentarians, as members scrutinizing the estimates documents, unless we had some sort of notion within the estimates that the border infrastructure fund was going to be used falsely to promote the G-8 legacy fund or to convey payments or contributions agreements under the G-8 legacy fund.... If it weren't for the Office of the Auditor General we wouldn't have been able to uncover that, because it's just too buried.
So there's nothing in this document, which was tabled and published after the Auditor General's report, that clearly defines that this $50 million in expenditure, along with a specific amount during fiscal year 2010-2011, was done outside of the normal envelope. It's not detailed in the public accounts, is it?