Here's my dilemma. It looks as though we're going to have to spend a moment at least on this, because we're into Mr. Byrne's questioning, and I know where he's about to go and I understand what you're saying.
The difficulty I have is that if I'm hearing it right, the government is maintaining that the motion they had before is before the committee--and we would pick that up when we go back, because it's unfinished business--and that also Mr. Byrne's motion is in front. Now, it can't be both. Both motions can't be in front of the committee at the same time. There is only one motion.
To the best of my knowledge, the motion was tabled as a notice of motion with the clerk. I'm not aware that we have been seized of that in camera yet. Therefore, I'm not yet convinced that it's protected by confidence, but I'm listening.