My line of thinking is that I would like to know why the G-8 legacy fund could not have been incorporated in some aspect of the economic action plan. According to what we've heard this morning, the criteria, the objectives of the plan, are a little more loose. The objective of the border infrastructure fund was specific—to create border infrastructure to facilitate trade. The production of gazebos and lakes were not part of that initiative.
The economic action plan also had a legacy component, which was to create conditions for longer-term competitiveness. Is there some reason why the G-8 legacy fund could not have been incorporated in some aspect of the economic action plan? If so, were other projects incorporated? Is anyone at the table aware of any other funded elements that did not meet any criteria within the economic action plan?