It's in order. I don't see anything out of order. It was a bit of a parliamentary sleight of hand, but it works and it's in order. The point of order is ruled deemed to be not a point of order.
Mr. Byrne, back to you.
On April 19th, 2012. See this statement in context.
The Chair NDP David Christopherson
It's in order. I don't see anything out of order. It was a bit of a parliamentary sleight of hand, but it works and it's in order. The point of order is ruled deemed to be not a point of order.
Mr. Byrne, back to you.
See context to find out what was said next.