Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Just for a point of clarity, the original motion that I had tabled on April 3, 2012, does represent a significant portion of my current motion. However, this is a motion for a witness list, which I'm trying to get to the business of, rather than repeating ourselves. Mr. Saxton, through use of his own procedural tactics and through other cooperation, has enabled himself by using the Conservative majority. The Saxton motion, which was tabled on April 5, with amendments from Mr. Shipley, was indeed passed on Thursday, if I remember correctly.
Without prejudice I say that I would have anticipated that would have made my April 3 motion no longer in order. I say that without prejudice. I'm just offering an opinion. So now what I'm trying to do, Mr. Chair, is simply establish the witness list, and I'd like to do that immediately.