I think so, because it's not an actual motion to go in camera, which clearly is not debatable. This is a motion to stay in public. We discussed it last time. I think it's in order.
On April 24th, 2012. See this statement in context.
On April 24th, 2012. See this statement in context.
The Chair NDP David Christopherson
I think so, because it's not an actual motion to go in camera, which clearly is not debatable. This is a motion to stay in public. We discussed it last time. I think it's in order.
See context to find out what was said next.