Okay, that's what I thought. I'm glad I checked.
Colleagues, if you recall at the last meeting, we had a situation where at one point there were two motions on the floor at the same time, which of course can't be, but that was where we found ourselves. I'm raising that because it's relevant as to whether or not this motion is in order on its own, or whether it requires a separate motion to be brought forward.
We dealt with Mr. Saxton's motion when we had those duelling motions at the last meeting. My advice from the clerk is that the motion by Mr. Byrne was actually moved. I accept that this is a bit unorthodox and I don't expect most people to follow what we're talking about because we're into the minutia of procedure, but procedure is a key element of democracy. But all of that is to say that I deem the motion to be in order and before the committee.
Mr. Byrne, your motion is now in front of us, and you have the floor and may speak to your motion.