I want to be sure that we're dealing with apples and apples here. I say that because obviously the department used Canadian estimates, and of course, figures that would be applied to the Canadian procurement, while the PBO used the American figures that were obtained from the government accountability office in the United States, which is geared towards the American procurement. There are also, of course, significant developmental costs involved in the American procurement. They're also looking at different aircraft, which are substantially different from the Canadian one with substantially more cost involved.
What I would like to know is, in your opinion, whether the method in the Canadian or the American context is more accurate. Where do we sit on this? I want to make sure we're comparing apples and apples, and not apples and oranges again.