Mr. Fonberg, that's very important, sir, because in November 2010—I appreciate the correction—the Department of National Defence, the Department of Public Works and Government Services, and the Government of Canada promised Parliament they would do things differently.
I respect and understand, sir, that any analysis or cost description prior to November 2010 could potentially be different, using the 20-year methodology. But after November 2010 a commitment was given to Parliament that we would use a new methodology, and any information that was given after 2010 that differed compared to what you promised you would do results in a contempt of Parliament, in my opinion.
Was any information given to Parliament after November 2010 that was contrary to what you promised to do—not you, sir, but the department and the Government of Canada?